Home

 

Added July 2, 2000. Updated January 8, 2001 19:11 hours.


 

International Colloquium on Comparative Archaeology

 

Old and New World Prehistory at the Crossroads

 

Columbus, Ohio, USA

April 23 to 28, 2001

 

Organized by

 

Max Baldia

The Comparative Archaeology WEB,
The Czech-American Research Program (CARPRO),
Institute for the Study of Earth and Man
Southern Methodist University

Bradley Lepper
Ohio_Historical_Society

1982 Velma Ave.
Columbus, OH 43211
USA
blepper@ohiohistory.org

Richard Yerkes
Anthropology
The Ohio State University,
140 Lord Hall
124 W. 17th Ave.
Columbus, OH  43210-1364
 yerkes.1@osu.edu

 



 

Mailing Address:

Dr. Maximilian O. Baldia, P. I.
 CARPRO
Dinsmore Castle Dr.
Columbus, OH 43221
USA

 

 

 

 

Preliminary Schedule:

The COLUMBUS meeting is organized in conjunction with the New Orleans SAA symposium on Comparative Archaeology to provide greater in-depth presentation and discussion and excursions to important US archaeological sites, including Ohio enclosures. It is scheduled to allow travel time for participants at the 66th SAA ANNUAL MEETING in New Orleans. Details depend on the final SAA schedule, to be announced in December 2000.

 

Overnight excursion to from New Orleans to Watson Brake and Poverty Point, some of the oldest earthworks in the US (in conjunction with the Annual SAA meeting). Details to be announced.

Return to New Orleans and travel to Columbus, Ohio.

Excursions to the picturesque Amish Country or to Chillicothe and the largest concentration of prehistoric Adena and Hopewell burial mounds and enclosures.

Excursion to Southwest Ohio prehistoric earthworks:

Visit to Fort Ancient, the largest Hopewell earthwork.

A tour of Indian Mound Park, including Williamson Mound, Pollock Earthworks and rock shelters, under the auspices of Prof. Dr. Robert Riordan, Chairman, Department of Anthropology, Wright State University, in Dayton, Ohio.

Public Roundtable Discussion at The Ohio State University. 

Excursion to Shrum (Adena) Mound, Campbell Park, Columbus.

Excursion to Highbanks Park Earthworks Adena burial mound and the Late Woodland earthworks in Delaware County.

Excursion led by Dr. Brad Lepper, Curator, Ohio State Historical Society and Prof. Dr. Yerkes, The Ohio State University:

Flint Ridge, a prehistoric flint quarry

Alligator Mound, a Late Woodland (?) effigy mound

The Newark geometric earthworks

Presentation of papers to the interested public at the Ohio Historical Society Headquarters and Museum, Columbus, Ohio.

 

Presentations:

 

Publication of the Proceedings:

 


 

Symposium Abstract

At the start of the 21st century archaeology finds itself at the crossroads between the traditional textbook-like overviews of world prehistory and the systematic, detailed comparisons and analysis between large cultural regions on a global basis. The ultimate aim of Comparative Archaeology is to ascertain the causes for observable similarities and differences in cultural development in different parts of the world.

This objective has yet to be realized, but the accumulation of large amounts of regional data in the Old and New World, combined with modern communication technology make this kind of research a possibility.

 

Of special interest is research on the interaction and communication between sites, especially those with monumental architecture. For example:

ˇ        How does communication between European causewayed or early medieval enclosures, US Hopewell enclosures or Central American Maya centers manifest itself in the archaeological record?

ˇ        Is there evidence for a developing infrastructure that facilitates communication, such as ceremonial avenues or even long-distance roadways?

ˇ        At what level of social complexity can one expect the development of such an infrastructure?

ˇ        What are the similarities and differences in the way communication is facilitated in different regions of the world?

 

This symposium brings together burgeoning research that deals with a fascinating array of comparisons and insights into changing communication patterns, economic forms, social structures and religious expressions around the world. It is exemplified by analysis of the spatial reorganization of settlement sites and the development and demise of  monumental architecture. It includes research on enclosures, henges, megalithic tombs, burial and temple mounds, ceremonial avenues and roadways. Examples are drawn from Africa, India, Bali, Europe, and the Americas (Maya, the US Southwest and Eastern Woodlands).




List of Participants



Dirk Raetzel-Fabian
Hessisches Landesmuseum, Kassel

Mailing Address
Herkulesstrasse 69
D-34119 Kassel
Germany
dirk.fabian@online.de

 

Douglas S. Frink
Archaeology Consulting Team, Inc.
57 River Road, Suite 1020
Essex, VT 05452
USA
DSFrink@aol.com

Ronald I. Dorn
Arizona State University
Main Campus
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
Department of Geography
PO Box 870104
Tempe, AZ  85287-0104
USA
atrid@IMAP1.ASU.EDU

J. McKim (Kim) Malville
Astrophysics and Planetary Sciences
University of Colorado at Boulder
USA
Kim.Malville@Colorado.EDU

Bradley Lepper
Ohio_Historical_Society
1982 Velma Ave.
Columbus, OH 43211
USA
blepper@ohiohistory.org

Ronald Hicks
Anthropology Dept.
Ball State University
Muncie, IN 47306
USA
ronhicks@yahoo.com

Richard Yerkes
Anthropology
The Ohio State University,
140 Lord Hall
124 W. 17th Ave.
Columbus, OH  43210-1364
USA
yerkes.1@osu.edu

Attila Gyucha

Munkácsy Mihály Múzeum, Békéscsaba

Széchenyi 9

5600 Hungary

gyuchaa@freemail.hu

 

William A. Parkinson
Anthropology Dept.
The Ohio State University

244 Lord Hall, 124 W. 17th Ave.

Columbus, OH 43210-1364

parkinson.34@osu.edu  

 

John Staeck
College of DuPage
425 22nd Street
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137-6599
USA
staeck@cdnet.cod.edu

Markus Vosteen
Württembergisches Landesmuseum Stuttgart
Schillerplatz 6,
70173 Stuttgart
Germany
mvosteen@gmx.de

 

Vernon L. Scarborough
Anthropology Dept
University of Cincinnati
2624 Clifton Avenue

Cincinnati, OH 45221
USA.
 
vernon.scarborough@uc.edu

Christel Baldia
Amish Cancer Project
The Ohio State University
A. James Cancer Hospital & R. J. Solove Research Institute
Human Cancer Genetics
300 West 10th St.
Suite 519
Columbus, OH 4321-1240
USA
giesdorf@surfree.com, Chandle-1.@medctr.osu.edu, Baldia.1@osu.edu

Mailing Address
3616 Dinsmore Castle Dr.
Columbus, OH 43221
USA

Maximilian O. Baldia
Institute for the Study of Earth and Man
Heroy Science Hall
Southern Methodist University
3225 Daniel Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75275-0274
USA.
mobaldia@earthlink.net

Mailing Address
3616 Dinsmore Castle Dr.
Columbus, OH 43221
USA


 


 Received Abstracts

J. McKim (Kim) Malville
Astrophysics and Planetary Sciences, Campus Box 391
University of Colorado at Boulder
Boulder, CO 80209
USA
Kim.Malville@Colorado.EDU

Self-organization of Ritual Landscapes and Monumental Architecture

Abstract
A useful concept for Comparative Archaeology is that of self-organization, which is a characteristic of natural landscapes and spontaneous human behavior. If the social dynamic has been natural and not planned or imposed, monumental architecture and settlement patterns should display the geometrical characteristics of self-organized systems. Comparisons of spontaneous versus planned landscapes are provided by the megalithic ceremonial center at Nabta in southern Egypt, the royal city of Vijayanagara, patterns of pilgrimage in Chaco and Varanasi, and the spatial organization of shrines and temples of the Kathmandu valley. A number of these sites display features of both spontaneous and controlled behavior.


Markus Vosteen
Württembergisches Landesmuseum Stuttgart
Schillerplatz 6,
70173 Stuttgart
Germany
mvosteen@gmx.de

Mailing Address:

Sofienstr. 2
70806 Kornwestheim
Germany

Sacred or Profane: Earthworks from a Religious Point of View

 

Abstract
Different kinds of Earthworks are known in the Old and the New World. All share just one common characteristic: the circumvallation with rampart and/or ditch. These circumvallations played an important role for the archaeological interpretation: either as a profane attribute with characteristics of a fortification, or simply as a border of a sacred area. All these interpretations are made by archaeologists. A more complex interpretation based on the history of religion is presented, focusing on the common phenomena of the sacred area and the associated sacred way. Their specific meanings are explored and expanded through a view from the outside.


Maximilian O. Baldia
Institute for the Study of Earth and Man
Heroy Science Hall
Southern Methodist University
3225 Daniel Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75275-0274
USA.
mobaldia@earthlink.net

Mailing Address
3616 Dinsmore Castle Dr.
Columbus, OH 43221
USA

Monuments at the Crossroads: Comparative Archaeology of North American and European Monuments.


Abstract

Archaeologists on both sides of the Atlantic raise the controversial question of prehistoric roads in “middle-range” societies. Spatial analysis of 5000 European Neolithic/Copper Age (megalithic) tombs indicates that they were built along major communication lines. Tombs mass near enclosures, which are often located near streams in elevated positions, implying that overland and water routes intersect near them. This suggests that enclosures function as nodes in the communication network. However, European evidence for actual roads remains elusive. Applying the model to American monuments of the Ohio/Mississippi drainage and the US Southwest provides evidence for (“graded”) ways, showing that many societies at similar technological stages of development adopt similar communication strategies.


 

Bradley Lepper
Ohio_Historical_Society
1982 Velma Ave.
Columbus, OH 43211
USA
blepper@ohiohistory.org

 

The Serpent and the Alligator: Ohio's Effigy Mounds in Context

Abstract
Efforts to understand Ohio's effigy mounds have been hampered by the lack of an objective chronology. Serpent Mound has been attributed to the Adena culture based on its proximity to Adena burial mounds. Alligator Mound has been attributed to the Hopewell culture based on its nearness to the Newark Earthworks. New data indicate both effigies are the work of the Fort Ancient culture and are approximately contemporaneous with the Effigy Mound culture of the upper Midwest. In this context, I interpret them as representations of the two principal inhabitants of the traditional Algonquian underworld: the serpent and the underwater panther.


Christel Baldia
Amish Cancer Project
The Ohio State University
A. James Cancer Hospital & R. J. Solove Research Institute
Human Cancer Genetics
 300 West 10th St.
Suite 519
Columbus, OH 4321-1240
USA
giesdorf@surfree.com, Chandle-1.@medctr.osu.edu, Baldia.1@osu.edu

Mailing Address
3616 Dinsmore Castle Dr.
Columbus, OH 43221
USA

Cultures at the Cross Roads: A Comparative Study of Native American, African and European Symbolism during the Early Colonial Period of the Southeastern US.


Abstract
During the early colonial days, West African, European and Native American peoples met in the Southeast of this country. They share similar social structure and iconography, although the assigned symbolic meaning may have been different. This created the basis for intense interaction between these peoples. Many of the symbols used found their way onto textiles, such as clothing, early slave quilts, or other body decorations. They can be traced back to West Africa, Europe or the Mississippian period in North America. Even today, the uniquely pieced costumes of the Seminole in Florida continue to use some of these symbols.


 

Richard W. Yerkes

Anthropology Dept.
The Ohio State University

244 Lord Hall, 124 W. 17th Ave.

Columbus, OH 43210-1364

yerkes.1@osu.edu

 

Attila Gyucha

Munkácsy Mihály Múzeum, Békéscsaba

Széchenyi 9

5600 Hungary

gyuchaa@freemail.hu

 

William A Parkinson
Anthropology Dept.
The Ohio State University

244 Lord Hall, 124 W. 17th Ave.

Columbus, OH 43210-1364

parkinson.34@osu.edu

 

 

Tribal “Cycling”: A Comparison of Long-Term Social Processes in the Copper Age of Central Europe and the Woodland Period of the Midwestern United States.

 

Abstract
This paper explores the utility of a comparative analysis for understanding long-term patterns of social change in “middle-range” or “tribal” societies living during the Middle and Late Woodland periods in the Ohio Valley and during the Neolithic and Copper Age on the Great Hungarian Plain. These societies inhabited relatively similar temperate floodplain environments and exhibited comparable levels of political and economic organization. Despite the fact that the social trajectory of each region was affected by its own historical factors, similar patterns of integration and interaction suggest cross-cultural similarities in the nature of social organization in tribal societies.


Ronald Hicks
Anthropology Dept.
Burkhart Building 
Ball State University
Muncie, IN 47306
USA

Phone: 756 285 2443, 756 285 2163, Fax: 756 284 1639
ronhicks@yahoo.com

It Would Look Right at Home in Wessex: New World-Old World Parallels in Early Agricultural Sacred Landscapes.

Though separated by over 3000 miles in space and 2000 years in time, early agricultural societies in two midlatitude mixed forest environments--southern Britain and the Ohio River drainage in North America--developed some remarkable parallels in manmade features of the landscape that appear to have been of a sacred or ritual nature. In both we find burial mounds and circular enclosures, the latter often with internal ditches and astronomical orientations. There are other parallels between these societies as well. This paper will compare these in some detail and offer possible explanations.


Douglas S. Frink
OCR Carbon Dating, Inc.
57 River Road, Suite 1020
Essex, VT 05452
USA

Phone: 802 897 2017
DSFrink@aol.com

and

Ronald I. Dorn
Arizona State University
Main Campus
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
Department of Geography
PO Box 870104
Tempe, AZ 85287-0104
USA
atrid@IMAP1.ASU.EDU

Beyond Taphonomy: Pedogenic Transformations of the Archaeological Record in Monumental Earthworks.

 

Abstract
Mesolithic and later peoples acted as aggradational and erosional geomorphic agents -- producing monumental earthworks including enclosures, mounds, and earth figures in temperate and arid environments. Taphonomic laws governing geologic processes underlie conventional interpretations of artifacts associated with monumental earthworks. Taphonomic explanations, without consideration for temporal and spatial scale, and ecological settings can render misleading conclusions for aggradational earthworks. Aerobic soils and rock surfaces are dynamic autopoetic systems whose metabolic processes affect the organization of associated artifacts. Studies from Texas, Louisiana, California, and the Czech Republic exemplify pathways by which pedogenic and weathering processes define spatial and temporal contexts.


 

Dirk Raetzel-Fabian
Hessisches Landesmuseum, Kassel

Mailing Address
Herkulesstrasse 69
D-34119 Kassel
Germany
dirk.fabian@online.de

 

Vacant Center - Vacant Periphery: Spatial Distribution of Monumental Enclosures

Abstract
Can the Hopewell "Vacant Center Model" by O. H. Prufer (1964) serve as a reasonable concept for the interpretation of monumental enclosures in Central Europe? The discussion of the use and function of earthworks has its roots in the 19th century, and arguments developed parallel in both parts of the world without an observable exchange of ideas and concepts. The high density distribution pattern of monumental enclosures on the northern fringe of the highland regions of Germany now raises questions similar to those in the Hopewell core region of Southern Ohio: which models are applied best to explain the distribution pattern against the background of social as well as spatial organization, communication and ritual?


John Staeck
College of DuPage
425 22nd Street
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137-6599
USA

Phone: 630 942 2022, Fax: 630 858 9845

staeck@cdnet.cod.edu

Rethinking the US Woodland/Mississippian and the Central European Neolithic/Copper Age.

 

The Neolithic in Central Europe and the Eastern Woodlands of the US are described and characterized in many, sometimes contradictory ways. The archaeology of the Woodland and Mississippian periods, as well as the TRB (Funnel Beaker) manifestations in Central and Northern Europe are subject to disparate interpretive schemes that portray the people as everything from egalitarian farmers to expansionist traders. Cross-cultural perspectives on independent sociopolitical developments are examined for both cases, taking into consideration new evidence from excavations in Moravia, Czech Republic.


 

Vernon L. Scarborough
Anthropology Dept
University of Cincinnati
2624 Clifton Avenue

Cincinnati, OH 45221
USA.
 
vernon.scarborough@uc.edu

 

Tropical Ecology and Economy: The Ancient Maya and the Living Balinese

 

The origins and development of statecraft constitute one of the fundamental arenas of anthropological enquiry.  Considerable thought has been invested in the processes that stimulated the rise of complex societies, especially in regard to the primary or incipient archaic states that are well-defined in the great floodplain margins of the Old World and apparent in the incised drainages of Peru and the lakeshore settings of Highland Mexico.  Less attention has been focused on semitropical and tropical statecraft as a meaningful dataset from which to assess the processes that mark complex society more generally.  This presentation will examine aspects of early state development as a subset of the broader political economy; it focuses on the relationship between state formation, water management and the engineered landscape in both the Maya Lowlands and Bali, Indonesia.

 


 

Home

 

Please send comments or questions to Max.Baldia