Previous Home 

Added April 26, 1998. Updated June 22, 2007, 22:39 -6 GMT

Figures

to

Megalithic Tombs and Interregional Communication

By

Maximilian O. Baldia

Southern Methodist University

Dallas, Texas, USA

Paper presented at the international symposium: Megaliths and Social Geography, 13-17 May, 1994, Falköping, Sweden.

 

 

Megalithic tomb distribution and core area

 

 

Figure 1. Location of all tombs. The coordinates are based on the German (1:25000) topographic map numbering system, which has been expanded to provide an equal area projection for the entire research area. The data consists of megalithic chambers and gallery-graves, cists, mounds with and without megalithic enclosure and chamber, as well as large stones, with or without drill marks (cup marked stones) and portholes, that may indicate megalithic tombs. For Denmark the data consists of 493 tombs, of which only the tombs around Århus represent a reasonable approximation of the known tombs. The 282 Polish tombs available for this research may also be too low.

 

 

 

 

Length and of all chamber types

 

 

Figure 2. Length and width of all chamber types (database as of 1993). Overall, chambers (first) become longer and (later) also wider through time. A mild split in density appears in chambers of ca. 7 m in length. This split is caused by the Nordic tendency to build polygonal to round chamber forms and the tendency in the Saxonian and Hercynian Zone to build long rectilinear chambers. The continuous distribution also implies an autochthonous evolution from primeval dolmen to passage- and gallery-grave.

 

 

 

 

Traditional Thiessen diagram

 

 

Figure 3. Traditional Thiessen diagram - a method also known as Voroni or Dirichlet tessellation - was used to analyze the location of 4089 tombs. The underlying assumption is that individual tombs, or tomb clusters, function as central places. The polygons are assumed to define the boundaries of tribal territories. The coordinates are based on the German (1:25000) topographic map numbering system, which has been expanded to provide an equal area projection for the entire research area.

 

 

 

 

Tentative model for the primary lines of interregional communication

 

 

Figure 4. Tentative model for the primary lines of interregional communication based on a spatial analysis of the tomb density of 4712 sites. The data consists of megalithic chambers and gallery-graves, cists, mounds with and without megalithic enclosure and chamber, as well as large stones, with or without drill marks (cup stones) and portholes, that may indicate megalithic tombs. The coordinates are based on the German (1:25000) topographic map numbering system, which has been expanded to provide an equal area projection for the entire research area.

 

 

 

 

Megalithic tombs of Sweden and Norway

 

 

Figure 5. Megalithic tomb distribution in Sweden and Norway (after Bägerfeldt 1993:48).

 

 



Megalithic tomb distribution in Denmark

 

 

Figure 6. Megalithic tomb distribution in Denmark (after Hansen 1993:3).

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 7. Model of the Falbygden communication network (Map and tomb location after Bägerfeldt 1993:212).

 



 


Bohuslän and Falbygden area

 

 

Figure 8. Geography of the Bohuslän and Falbygden area. Even today the roads from the West Coast and Skåne are literally funneled into the Falbygden area around Falköping by the two largest lakes in Sweden, while only a few roads lead through the marshy lake district to the north northeast. Hjo is almost directly opposite Alvastra. From Hjo Route 194 and 49 lead via Axvall to Skara and from there via Route 184 to Lindköping. From Lindköping secondary roads lead in the direction of Kållansö. Alternatively, a network of secondary roads accomplishes the same from Hjo via Falköping.

 

 

 

 

Sea route between southern Sweden, Bornholm and Poland

 

 

Figure 9. Sea route between southern Sweden, Bornholm and Poland as indicated by TRB pottery (squares) found in the Baltic Sea (after Nielsen and Nielsen 1990:55 Fig. 1, tomb location after Hansen 1993). Black squares = location of pottery retrieved from the sea. Black dots = tombs on Bornholm.

 

 

 

Figure 10. Megalithic tomb distribution on the Elbe (after Preuß 1980 Map 2, with partial additions from H. Nelson 1988 and Sprockhoff 1966, 1975).Dark lines = probable lines of communication, dotted line = possible line of communication.

 

 

 

 

four dolmen in long-mounds, Grundoldendorf-Bliedersdorf

 

 

Figure 11. Part of the 20-30 m wide Neolithic road flanked by four dolmen in long-mounds, Grundoldendorf-Bliedersdorf, Kr. Staade, Lower Saxony (Sprockhoff 664-667). The mounds are located at the highest point of the road or, more appropriately, avenue. The southern extension of the road has been partly destroyed by what appear to be two deep, moss-covered, modern pits and has left no obvious traces in the current landscaped. But starting in the vicinity of tomb 667/IV, the road forms a U-shaped depression that continues along the mounds and down the soft northern slope towards Nottendorf as a wide, barely visible V-shaped depression in the plowed fields. Some two kilometers north, this direction intersects with modern Highway 73 (Stade-Horneburg-Harburg) and the marshes of the Elbe. The modern Appensen-Horneburg road roughly parallels the tombs, joining Highway 73 near the Luhe River. The entrances of all four dolmen (open arrows) face the road. The mounds are offset so that the horizon is visible and celestial orientation of the entrances are possible. Chambers I-III face the afternoon sun, while Chamber IV faces the morning sun. The above illustration is derived from Schuchhardt (1905), Wegewitz (1949) and Sprockhoff (1975). Supposedly Tomb 665/II is to be rotated 180° (Sprockhoff 1975:25-27). However, a personal ground check (May 1994) confirmed Schuchhardt's observations as illustrated. The entrance reconstruction of Tomb 664/I (Altlasblatt 32) is unlikely, because there is sufficient visual evidence to suggest that all entrances are similar to Sprockhoff's reconstruction of Tomb 665/II. The north error in Wegewitz 1949:10 Fig. 6 seems misaligned. Sprockhoff's Atlas orientations are preferable and form the basis for above arrow, although more precise measurements could be useful.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 12. Segment of Early Neolithic megalithic tomb alignment in the northern part of the Everstorfer Forst near Barendorf, Kr. Grevesmühlen (Tombs after Schuldt 1972: 11 Fig. 1). Heavy italic numbers inside long-mounds refer to the possible order of their construction. (Location of A41 is approximated.)

 

 

 

 

Primeval dolmen near Schwinge River

 

 

Figure 13. Primeval dolmen location near probable ford on the Schwinge River by Pustow, Kr. Demmin with hypothetical Early Neolithic road. (Tomb location after Nagel 1985: 8 Fig. 1.) Open rectangle = Long-mound.

 

 

 

 

Extended dolmen near the Schwinge River

 

 

Figure 14. Sequential construction of extended dolmen along the model of the Early Neolithic road on the Schwinge River by Pustow, Kr. Demmin. (Tomb location after Nagel 1985: 8 Fig. 1.) Open rectangle = Log-Mound.

 

 

 

Combined model of the Neolithic road network and tombs near the Schwinge

 

 

Figure 15. Establishment of a second ford in conjunction with the model of the Neolithic road network near the Schwinge River, Kr. Demmin. (Tomb location after Schuldt 1972 16 Fig. 3.). The roads are now lined with primeval dolmen, extended-dolmen and grand-dolmen. Open rectangle = Long-mound, arrow = chamber entrance. Dark stippled lines = probable lines of communication, light stippled line = possible line of communication.

 

 

 

 

Model of Neolithic roads in the Netherlands

 

 

Figure 16. Model of Neolithic roads in the Netherlands (map with tomb locations after Jager 1985:189 Fig. 2, location of D9 after De Groot 1988). An east/west road (stippled line) follows along D9, D8 and D7. This road intersected to the west of D7 with a south southwest/north northeast road (stippled line) which ran along D12, D11 and D10. North of D10 the prehistoric route must have coincided with the modern road. The two roads probably intersected in the northeast.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 17. Location of passage-graves (dots) at Karleby, Väster Götland (after Sjögren) with superimposed hypothetical roads. Dark stippled lines = probable lines of communication, light stippled line = possible line of communication. Note that the possible way, leading east from the Ålleberg, down the extremely steep slop is unlikely to have been used for wheeled transport.

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 18. Historical road near Häggum, lined by large stones and tombs, Falbygden as recorded in the 1790's (after Olsbo 1986 Fig. 16).

 

 

 

 

Location of the megalithic tombs in Falbygden

 

 

Figure 19. Location of the megalithic tombs in Falbygden, Väster Götland ( Kælas 1981, after Hyenstrand 1979 with polygons removed and the addition of one tomb near Karleby after Englund and Sjögren 1994).

 

 

 

Orientation of 786 chamber entrances

 

 

Figure 20. Orientation of 786 chamber entrances. Mean = 152.001,° Median = 156.000.°

 

 

 

Gallery-grave distribution

 

 

Figure 21. Model of gallery-grave communication network (map after Kappel 1979). The Schortewitz tomb has been moved west of the Saale River, just south of Köthen. The tomb at Kruft, the approximate location of another possible chamber west of the Rhein and the Belgian tombs have been added (light rectangles), as has Stein and the flint mines of Rijckholt-St. Geertruid. Dark lines = probable lines of communication, lightly stippled lines = possible lines of communication.

 

 

C14 dates of German gallery-graves and masonry chambers

 

 

Figure 22. Box-and-Whiskers graph of nineteen C14 dates of German gallery-graves and masonry chambers, including the Dutch proto-gallery-grave of Stein, based on Beier 1991a:183a List 24. (The original standard deviations have not been evaluated.) The median is the horizontal line, which splits the ordered dates in half. The top and bottom of the central box, termed inner hinges or fences, mark the halfway point of the remaining halves of the data. The Hspread, which is comparable to the interquartile range or midrange, is the absolute value of the difference of the values between the two hinges. The inner fences are ±1.5 Hspread, the outer ±3Hspread (Wilkinson 1992:189-203). The dates within the box (inner fences) indicate the most likely building period of the tombs. The vertical lines or whiskers mark less likely dates. The oldest date of 2830±60 b.c., belonging to Stein, is indicated by the outer fence (uppermost hinge). Although it seems unlikely that this date applies to the actual construction of the tomb, this cannot be ruled out entirely. This contrast with the youngest date of 1920±100 b.c. stemming from charcoal found at Etteln. The date is marked by an asterisk, indicating an outside value that is quite likely the result of later activity, unrelated to the original construction and use of the gallery-graves.

 

 

Schankweiler stone cist

 

 

Figure 23. Germany's westernmost excavated "megalithic tomb," Schankweiler, Kr. Bitburg (after Schindler 1967:45 Fig. 3). The small chamber takes advantage of a natural rock outcrop, which forms its western side wall (Photo). The other three sides are formed by stone slabs. The entrance is a porthole.


Previous Home