Added
![]()
Revision 2.4
By
Maximilian O.
![]()
List of Figures
Tables
1. The first OCR dates from the Czech Republic
![]()
It is the purpose of this report to inform you of the ongoing research
progress of the Rmíz Project with particular focus on the Rmíz textile. The
fieldwork took place from
The Rmíz Research Project in the
Located in
In
Centered far to the north (Fig. 3), the TRB is only one of several overlapping and partly
coexisting pottery stiles in
The TRB is divided into several regional groups,
which change through time. Generally speaking, the pottery in
The Moravian TRB can be divided into two main phases:
Unfortunately, the precise dating of these phases is uncertain. The few
available existing TRB I C14 dates come
largely from outside the research area (Fig. 5).
This stresses the acute necessity for the systematic gathering of absolute
dates. There seem to be even fewer dates available for the TRB
II. The precise end of the TRB is as unclear as its
beginning. However, sometime around 3400 BC, the influence of the Baden
culture, centered in the
During the Neolithic and the Copper Age (Eneolithic) a large number of sites were constructed with walls and ditches (Fig. 6). These walls and ditches are often referred to as causewayed enclosures (Andersen 1975, 1996). Rmíz is part of a ca. 60 km long chain of eleven such sites, ranging from Rmíz and Olomouc in the north to Brno in the south (Fig. 7). The immediate research area contains a total of nine sites in a ca. 340 km2 area, not counting the tomb groups that hint at additional villages and somewhat contemporaneous Late Lengyel sites. The sites have been only briefly surveyed and are threatened by pot hunters, as well as agricultural and industrial development.
Rmíz appears to be the most important and best preserved of these fortified
sites. Nine test trenches have established its general age and construction
sequence (Smíd 1995 Fig. 3). In addition, an
estimated 10% of the nearby satellite site of Laskov,
located below Rmíz, has been unearthed (Smíd in
press). Rmíz itself is located on a steep promontory (Fig.
8), which presents a rather imposing feature in the
Rmíz is a multi phase (TRB I and II) walled hilltop site with a TRB II satellite copper production site and two adjacent burial mound clusters. The satellite site of Laskov is some 400 m SW, but in the valley below, adjacent to two Lengyel sites. It is close to a creek that feeds the narrow Sumice stream and yielded a partly destroyed "kiln" and copper slag. The two tomb clusters are located 200 and 800 m north of Rmíz.
There are four enclosures at Rmíz (Fig. 8). A shallow trapezoidal ditch and palisade define the outermost perimeter in the north. This enclosure encompassed 17.5 ha (Zone 1). Indications are that it was concomitant with the earliest occupation (TRB I) and could have functioned as a coral. However, the lack of diagnostic artifacts directly associated with the feature makes its dating uncertain.
The massive stone-faced rampart system with its ditch (Zone 3) dates to the TRB I. The pottery style indicates that it was erected during TRB I B (Baalberge phase) and the test results from our 1998 research, described below, imply that this area was first occupied around 3800 BC. The area enclosed by this unique stone wall system is 9.4 ha. The 1.4 m thick wall is made of local stone slabs, occasionally reaching a length of ca. 100 cm. A platform of 1.2 m separated the wall from the ditch, which was hewn into the bedrock.
Outside of this rampart is a spring-fed reservoir, that was later incorporated into a second fortified area (Zone 2). This 11 ha zone of settlement debris was demarcated by another wall and ditch during the TRB II. The earth wall to ditch height differential reaches 2.7 m in places. The smallest fortification (Zone 4) encloses the highest area of Rmíz. On the steep southern slope, an undated refuse heap or midden occurs. A brief survey indicates rubble and well preserved but undated animal bones on the surface. This area, like the rest of Rmíz, requires careful long-term archaeological investigation.
Adjacent to Rmíz are three tomb clusters. The most distant one must belong to an unknown "central site," that guarded the far end of the Sumice valley. Kremela I is 800 m and Kremela II is merely 200 m north of the palisade.
Kremela I consists of 58 mounds. They range from round tumuli to oval and rectilinear long-mounds, varying in length from 6-29 m and in width from 5-12 m. Mounds can reach a maximum height of nearly 2 m. The excavation of Mound 2 revealed a rectangular drywall enclosure. Within the eastern end of the enclosure, along the central axis, two cremation burials were unearthed. Among the cremation remains were fragments of cloth. The tomb provided evidence of minimally two construction phases. The first was the enclosure in which the burial took place. This was covered up with clay to the height of the enclosure. Stratigraphically, it is apparent that the burial took place before the mound was completed which constitutes first evidence ever of multiple building phases. Further research will delineate more details on the exact context of the artifact.
At Kremela II, seventeen mounds can be identified. Their length range from 6-11 m. Mounds 8 and 9 were excavated. Mound 8 contained two cremation burials at its eastern end. Mound 9 contained three cremation burials buried in pots, which were placed upside down. Each pot had been broken with a well-aimed hit. One urn contained remains of a child. The two others contained bones of one or two adults. The occurrence of multiple burials in the same grave is thus far unique. The grave also contained twelve additional pots.
The excavations have not yet yielded burial evidence of the earliest phases,
for Kremela I Mound 2 belongs to TRB
II A. Kremela II Mound 9 belongs to TRB II B, when the TRB comes to
an end in
The first burial mounds date to the TRB I
B2, that is the later part of the Baalberge phase (Fig. 4).
This may imply internal social changes through time. The tiny chambers, made of
stone slabs, contain single individuals, resting on their side in a flexed
position. This layout is typical for the entire Baalberge group, suggesting
intensive interregional communication, with
The final stage correlates with the TRB II B (Ohrozim phase). Stone construction disappears from the
mound entirely with the occasional exception of a smattering of stones used to
cover the grave. One of the two graves in an egg-shaped mound at Slatinky had an upside down urn placed into a pit (ibid.).
On top of it were two smaller upside-down pots. The TRB
emphasis on relatively elaborate tombs wanes, as the
A 1 m by 1 m test pit was dug at a randomly selected location within the Rmíz site. The test pit was excavated to 113 cm below the surface. The lowest defined level of 106-113 cm consisted of sapolite (decomposing rock) and clay.
Artifacts from the test excavation included chunks of burnt clay, probably from the wattle and daub construction of one or more burnt houses. Evidence for houses is exceedingly rare in the entire TRB culture area (Podborský et al.1993 Fig. 95, 113).
Among the upper rubble was a ceramic spindle whorl, 5 cm in diameter with a
central hole 0.9 cm (Fig. 12
- 13. Similar textile production related tools,
including loom weights, are on exhibit at the
The remaining cultural material from the test excavation consists of animal
and human bones, teeth, and numerous pottery sherds,
including those classified as Early Baalberge TRB
Phase I by Smíd.
To ascertain the feasibility of employing the new Oxidizable Carbon Ratio (OCR) soil dating method in Central Europe, and to gain the first insights into the local pedogenesis and "absolute" chronology, soil samples were taken 5 cm intervals during the test excavation.
The new OCR procedure focuses on the effect of the biochemical degradation
of charcoal and humic material in the soil. This can
be measured by the ratio of the total carbon to the readily oxidizable
carbon. Since the rate of biochemical degradation of the relatively stable
forms of organic matter varies within the specific physical and environmental
contexts of the sample, the ages of the individual (oxidizable)
carbon sample are determined by a formula that is designed to account for the
biological influences of oxygen, moisture, temperature, and the soil's
reactivity (Frink 1992, 1994). The test results, prepared by
Sometime after 1705 AD (perhaps around 1850-1900) the area was destabilized and active erosion brought roughly 5-9 cm of soil down slope to the area chosen for the test pit. The erosion buried the earlier soil deposits.
This second pedon, beginning at about 10 cm below the present surface, was stable for some 4500 years.[1] It consists of colluvial soils washed down from either the second rampart, or from up slope near the first rampart and ditch. The actual age of this destabilization occurred some time between 3250 and 2999 cal BC.[2] Given the relatively gentle slope along this portion of the site, 50 cm of colluvial deposits suggest that the area may not have had any significant vegetation at all.
The area sampled by the test pit indicates abandonment as the living area
sometime after 3250 BC.[3]
This would coincide with the presumed demise of the Funnel Beaker culture (TRB) at the southern fringes of its distribution. The
The first occupation ascertainable from the test pit predates 3742 BC and
most likely occurred around 3812 BC. This matches the Miroslav
Smíd's impression, based on the pottery typology,
that the earliest TRB (Baalberge with Michelsberg
affinities) is not represented at the site. (Michelsberg pottery occurs
primarily along the Rhein/Rhine River.) This earliest
TRB phase probably dates to about 4000 BC in
In addition to information about the earliest and latest occupation at Rmíz, an apparent three prepared house floors and one (trash / burial) pit came to light. These features belong to cultural activity dated between ca. 3812 and 3250 BC. The upper floor dates to about 3542 BC, the second to ca. 3662 BC and the lowermost to about 3742 BC. The pit feature contains organic material that date to 3812 BC, and contains slightly older organic materials dating to 3827 BC capping the feature. The site was abandoned after 3250 BC as indicated by washed in soil deposits capping the cultural soil deposits.
Current research focuses on the Rmíz textile (Fig. 11). It is thought to be made of wool, but a fiber analysis needs to be done to validate this view. Therefore, different textile specialists have been contacted, requesting suggestions as to where and by whom this fiber analysis ought to be conducted. (cf. Oldest Cloth/New Test Results). Further more, no textile from this time period has as yet been radiocarbon dated. A C14 date (a destructive procedure) on the textile will follow the fiber analysis. Due to the small amount of available organic material, the more expensive particle accelerator (AMS) method of dating the cloth will be required.
Dating the collagen of the animal and human remains plus C14 dating of soil humates and charcoal may provide independent verification of the OCR results.
The artifact analysis and visual documentation, including photographs are in progress and will result in updates of this report.
Computerized mapping of the landscape around Rmíz is in preparation and the
feasibility of utilizing satellite based mapping in the
A comparative research strategy is planned to analyze textiles from
The research team publishes a progress report about the ongoing research on the web, and updates it periodically.
The 1998 fieldwork indicates that the Rmíz research area gives every promise
of having been a major center with metallurgy, cloth production, trade and
communication, monumental architecture (occasionally reaching nearly megalithic
proportions) and very possibly an incipient or even complex status inequality.
Previous surveys, preliminary excavations, but especially the 1998 field
research indicate that this strategically located settlement was established at
an early stage of the TRB occupation in
Rmíz is the northwestern most link in a long chain of eleven similar
"central" sites dotting the Neolithic/Copper Age central Moravian
landscape. Together they suggest control of communication in the
It is urgent to investigate the region, using combining Czech and
American theories and methods, before economic development and industrial
expansion eradicate these usually well preserved places. The urgency is
increased by the threat of pot hunters, who in late 1997 recklessly pitted at
least one of the large sites and excavated a several cubic meter large hole at
Rmíz itself in the spring of 1998.
Andersen, Niels H.
1975 Die neolithische Befestigungsanlage in Sarup
auf Fünen (Dänemark). Archäologisches
Korrespondenzblatt, 5/1:11-14.
1997 Sarup Vol. 1. The
Sarup enclosures.
1995 A Spatial Analysis of Megalithic Tombs.
Vol. 1-2. Ph. D. Dissertation. Southern
Bogucki,
1988
Frink, D.
1994 The Oxidizable Carbon Ratio (OCR): A Proposed Solution to Some of the Problems Encountered with Radiocarbon Dating. North American Archaeologist. Vol. 15-1:17-29
1992 The Chemical Variability
of Carbonized Organic Matter Through Time. Archaeology of
Podborský, Vladimír, et al.
1993 Pravěké
Dějiny Moravy. Vlastivěda Moravská Země a Lid, Nová Rada 3. Muzejní a
vlastivědna společnost, Brno.
Smíd, Miroslav
In press Sidliste nalevkovitych poharu u Laskova,
okr. Prost Prostejov, Pravek, Nova Rada 6, cca 50 S.
1995 Výsledky
zjist'ovacího výzkumu na eneolitickém hradisku Rmíz u Laskova. Pravek,
Nova Rada 3, 1993:19-77.
1994a Ein
Burgwall mit steinerner Stirnmauer aus der älteren Stufe der
Trichterbecherkultur auf dem Burgwall Rmíz bei Laskov
im Kataster der Gemeinde Námt na Hané,
Kreis Olomouc, Land Mähren. Jahresschrift für mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte,
76:201-230.
1994b Nástin periodizace kultury s nálevkovitým poháry na Moravé, Pravek, Nova Rada2, 1992, 131-157.
1993 Kultura nalevkovitych poharu. Praveké dejiny Moravy, Brno, 165 - 179.
1992 Druhé eneolitické mohylové pohebišt na katastru obce Nám
na Hané, okr. Olomouc. Pravek, Nova Rada 1,
1991:44-65, Brno.
1991 Nove
nalezy kultury s moravskou malovanou keramikou na Prostejovsku. Archeologické
rozhledy XLIII, 186-206.
1990 Prispevek
k poznání eneolitických mohylových pohrebišt' na strední Morave. Praveké
a slovanské osídlení Moravy 1990:67-89, Brno.
1983 Vyzkum
eneolitickych mohyl na Kosiri u Slatinek (okr. Prostejov), Prehledy vyzkumu
198:22, Brno.
1981 Stratigrafické
pozorování na výinném eneolitiékem sidlisti Rmíz u Laskova, okr. Prostéjov,
Prehledy výzkum 1979:17, Brno.
Smíd, M. and Stuchlikova, J.
In press Treti namestske eneoliticke mohylove pohrebiste, Pravek, Nova Rada 7.
Cizmar, Z. and Smíd, M.
1996 Hroby kultury se snurovou keramikou z Urcic, okr. Prostejov, Archeologické rozhledy XLVIII:289-299.
Svoboda, J. and Smíd, M.
1996 Dilensky objekt kultury nalevkovitych poharu na Stranske skale, Pravek, Nova Rada 4, 1994:79-125..
Zielinski G.A., Zielinski, P.A. Mayewski, L.D. Meeker, S. Whitlow, M.S. Twickler, M. Morrison, D.A. Meese, A.J. Gow, R.B. Alley
1994 Record of Volcanism Since 7000 B.C. from the GISP2
Neolithic/Copper
Age Link Index: Links to News Bulletins, Articles, Site Reports,
Databases, etc. about the Neolithic/Copper Age in
![]()
Please send comments or questions to Max Baldia.
![]()
[1] A pedon is a unit of weathering soil consisting of the A Horizon (the organic layer of plant growth and a zone of elluviation) and it's associated B Horizon (a zone of illuviation). The C Horizon (unweathered sediments) are not considered as part of the pedon. A soil profile may contain one or more pedons depending on it's unique history of depositional events. A flood plain soil, or anthropogenic mound soil (burial mounds), may have several pedons defining the periods of active pedogenic stability between events of deposition.
[2] There
is a significant climatic anomaly suggested in the oceans around
[3] Beyond the test pit, the highest part of Rmíz was re-fortified during the late Bronze Age or Hallstatt Period, according to M. Smíd.