Added March 29, 1998. Updated November 20, 2001, 19:20 hours
Revision 3.0
Copyright: The Comparative Archaeology WEB 1998-November 20, 2001© All rights reserved.
Czech/American Research Program (CARPRO)
3616 Dinsmore Castle
Dr.
Columbus, OH 43221-4410
USA
Research Associate
Inst. for the Study of Earth and Man
Heroy Science Hall
Southern Methodist University
3225 Daniel Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75275-0274
USA
Miroslav Šmíd
Ústav archaeologické památkové péce Brno
pracoviste Prostjov
Krízkovského 12
796 01 Prostejov
Czech Republic
Paper presented at the symposium: "Prehistoric Communication: The
first wheels, roads, metals, and monumental architecture" at the 63rd
Annual Meeting of the Society of American Archaeology, Seattle,
Washington, USA.[1]
Abstract
The hilltop fort Rmíz, Czech Republic, is the oldest in a long chain of
eleven similar central sites dotting the Early Neolithic/Copper Age Moravian
landscape. Strategically located, the site was built in the earliest phase of
the Funnel Beaker Culture's Baalberge Group (4000/3800-3600/3500 cal. BC). It
was constructed in an area where several cultures overlap. The fort's earliest
construction phase consists of the first stone faced rampart in
Central/Northern Europe. There are traces of copper production, including slag.
Three tomb clusters with dozens of long-mounds and tumuli yielded cloth
fragments and evidence of changes in burial practices.
Introduction
Located in Central Europe , the ancient hilltop
fort Rmíz by Laškov, Czech Republic, appears to
be the oldest in a long chain of eleven similar "central sites"
dotting the Early Neolithic/Copper Age Moravian landscape. In Moravia, this
period is characterized by the appearance of pottery from the Funnel
Beaker culture or TRB (Fig. 1). Evidence
of the earliest stone-built defensive wall in Central and Northern Europe,
together with its state of preservation, sheer size and multiple construction
phases, make Rmíz one of the most significant sites in Central Europe. Located
some 30 miles SW of the beginning of the strategic Moravian Gap or Gate,
traditionally viewed as the pass for the "Amber Road," which
connected North and SE Europe, Rmíz is a pivotal site in the control of communication
and the burgeoning copper trade.
Cultural affiliation
and Chronology
In Northern Europe the TRB belongs to the Early Neolithic dated 4100/3900 -
3500/3400 cal. BC, which is followed by the Middle Neolithic, lasting up to
2900/2800 BC.[1] This is part of the Copper Age
or Eneolithic in Central Europe.
Centered far to the north, the TRB is seen as only one of several overlapping
and partly coexisting pottery stiles in Moravia. The early TRB seems intrusive
in this region, once dominated by the Danubian Bandkeramik
or Linear Pottery of the first farmers. The Bankeramik-derived Lengyel pottery, known as Moravian Painted Ware (MPW), Jordanov (Jordanów/Jordansmühl), and other pottery
styles seem to coexists stratigraphically with early TRB (Table 1).
The TRB pottery of the Czech Republic belongs to the South Group. Its earliest ceramics are related to the Baalberge Group, concentrated along the upper Elbe of Bohemia and Central Germany. This pottery may, therefore, be intrusive in Moravia, where it ultimately replaces the ancient Danubian-derived Lengyel stiles. The Moravian TRB can be divided into two main phases, which can be further subdivided. The C14 dates, suggest the existence of Baalberge (TRB I) roughly between 4000-3600/3500 cal BC.
The following period, TRB II dates to ca. 3600/3500-3200? BC. It is characterized by an apparently gradual, but increasing drift toward Baden-like “channel ware” pottery, starting during Baden I (Boleráz Phase). A similar situation is noted in Austria, Slovakia, and Poland. The Baden-like pottery ultimately replaces the TRB South Group entirely.
The precise dating of these phases is uncertain, stressing the acute necessity for the systematic effort to date the TRB in Moravia. However, investigations since 1998 by the Czech-American Research Program (CARPRO) has provided the first OCR dates (see below).
The fortified sites of
Central Moravia
Rmíz is part of a ca. 60 km long chain of eleven similar "central
sites," ranging from Rmíz and Olomouc in the north to Brno in the south (Fig. 2). Additional sites, such as Starý Zámek by
Jevišovice (Map)
may extend the line to the Austrian border. The "central sites" in
the immediate research area are shown on the Map
and described in Table 2.
This is a total of nine sites in a ca. 340 m2 area, not
counting the tomb groups that hint at additional villages and somewhat
contemporaneous Langyel sites.[2] The
hilltop sites appear to be largely intervisible, in a manner similar to Pueblo
sites in the US Southwest. The sites have been only briefly surveyed, making
modern, large-scale excavation a necessary.
The research area still contains four preserved enclosed hilltop sites and two
that have been largely destroyed. The precise relationship of these sites must
be established through a comprehensive research project. Nevertheless, nine
test trenches at Rmíz (Smíd 1995 Fig. 3), excavations at the satellite site
(Smíd in press), and of several burial mounds establish the site as one of the
most significant.
The hill fort of Rmíz
Rmíz is a multiphase (TRB I and II) walled hilltop site with a (TRB II)
satellite copper production site and two adjacent burial mound clusters. The
satellite site is some 400m SW, but in the valley below, adjacent to two
Lengyel sites. It is close to a creek that feeds the narrow Šumice stream and
yielded a partly destroyed "kiln" and copper slag. The two tomb
clusters are located 200 and 800 m north of Rmíz, across the paved logging
road that follows a pass between the hills of Rmíz and Kremela. They cling to
the Kremela's eastern side, just where the terrain slopes most gently down to
the narrow Šumice valley.
There are four enclosures at Rmíz (Fig. 3 ).[3] The outermost perimeter in the north is
defined by a shallow trapezoidal ditch and palisade. This enclosure encompassed
17.5 ha (Zone 1). Indications are that it was concomitant with the
earliest occupation (TRB I) and could have functioned as a coral. However, the
lack of diagnostic artifacts directly associated with the feature makes its
dating uncertain.
The massive stone-faced rampart of Zone 3 with its ditch dates to the TRB I (Fig. 4). It was erected during TRB I B Baalberge phase.
Preliminary
investigations in June 1998 yielded OCR dates that indicate the
human building activity just inside the wall started around 3800 BC. The
enclosed area is 9.4 ha. The unique 1.4 m thick wall is made of local
stone slabs, occasionally reaching a length of ca. 100 cm (Fig. 5). A platform of 1.2 m separated the wall
from the ditch, which was hewn into the bedrock. In 1999 CARPRO discovered that
two stone walls existed next to each other. Several additional ditches,
possibly with additional walls, can be seen in front of the main rempart.
The rampart may have been entered through a gate via a roadway, similar to the
later fieldstone cobbled road at Hlinsco, by Lipník nad Bečvóu west of the
Morava River (Location).
At the eastern terminus of the rampart is a slight, followed by a mound-like
(natural?) elevation that could have functioned as a kind of lookout tower.
Outside of the Zone 3 rampart is a spring fed reservoir, that was later
incorporated into Zone 2. This 11 ha zone of settlement debris was
demarcated by an earth wall and ditch during the TRB II. The wall/ditch
height differential reaches a 2.7 m in places.
On the steep southern slope is an undated refuse heap or midden. A brief
survey indicates rubble and well preserved, but undated animal bone on the
surface.
The cultural landscape of Rmíz creates a most imposing impression. Located
imposingly above the valley of furtile soils (Fig. 6,
7, 8), it suggests the
seat of a powerful group, possibly an elite, controlling communication, copper
production and burial ritual of the surrounding countryside.
Adjacent to Rmíz are three tomb clusters. The
most distant one must belong to an unknown "central site," that
guarded the far end of the Sumice valley. Kremela I is 800 m and Kremela
II is merely 200 m north of the palisade.
Kremela I consists of 58 mounds. They range from round tumuli to oval and
rectilinear long-mounds, varying in length from 6-29 m and in width from
5-12 m. Mounds can reach a maximum height of nearly 2 m. The
excavation of Mound 2 revealed a rectangular drywall enclosure ( Fig. 9). Within the eastern end of the enclosure, along
the central axis two cremation burials were unearthed. Among the cremation
remains were fragments of "petrified," black colored cloth. The tomb
provided evidence of minimally two construction phases. The first was the
enclosure in which the burial took place. This was covered up to the height of
the enclosure with clay. After the burial ceremony, the mound was completed.
This was the first evidence ever of multiple building phases.
At Kremela I seventeen mounds can be identified. Their length ranges from
6-11 m. Mounds 8 and 9 were excavated. Mound 8 contained two destroyed
cremation burials at its eastern end. Mound 9 contained three cremation burials
in pots, which were placed upside down. Each pot had been broken with a well
aimed hit. One urn contained remains of a child. The two others contained bones
of one or two adults. The occurrence of multiple burials in the same grave is
thus far unique. The grave also contained twelve additional pots.
The excavations have not yet found the earliest burials. Kremela I Mound 2
belongs to TRB II A. Kremela II Mound 9 belongs to TRB II B, when the TRB
comes to an end in Moravia. However, excavations of other tomb clusters round out
our knowledge of the evolution of burial practices that can be linked to Rmíz
itself.
Tomb evolution
The first Burial mounds appear in the TRB I B2, i.e. the later part of the
Baalberge culture ( Table1).
This implies that they are the result of internal social changes. The tiny
chambers, made of stone slabs, contain single individual, resting on their side
in a flexed position. This layout is typical for the entire Baalberge culture,
suggesting intensive interregional communication, also evident in the pottery.
The oldest mounds are thus far only known from Borí I (Slatinky). There
one oblong mound, topped with locally available stones, contained a pair of
side by side cists (Borí I, Slatinky, Smíd 1990 Fig. 4). The ceramic
contents is synchronous with the second stratigraphic layer at Rmíz.
The second stage of burial construction develops during the TRB II A. It
is characterized by substituting the mound's stone cover with rectangular to
oval drywall, showing increased emphasis on the external aspects of the tomb,
as shown at the Rmíz tomb cluster Kremela I, Mound 2. The cists are replaced by
a burial area, serving as platform for cremation urns. The individual burials
harbor personal belongings, including cloth, pendants beads. Mound 4 at
Borí II (Slatinky) contained numerous pots, including a collared
flask and a ground stone ax (Smíd 1990).
The final stage correlates with the TRB II B (Ohrozim phase). Stone
construction disappears from the mound entirely with the occasional exception
of a smattering of stones used to cover the grave. One of the two graves in an
egg-shaped mound at Slatinky had an upside down urn placed into a pit (ibid.).
On top of it were two smaller upside-down pots. The TRB emphasis on relatively
elaborate tombs wanes, as the Baden pottery stile, coming from the Carpathian
Basin in the south, begins to dominate.
Summary and conclusion
Rmíz gives every promise of having been a major center-with metallurgy, cloth
production, trade and communication, monumental architecture, occasionally
reaching nearly megalithic proportions, and very possibly an incipient or even
complex status inequality. Survey and preliminary excavations indicate that
this strategically located settlement was established at an early stage of the
TRB occupation. Most significantly, Rmíz is the oldest known hilltop fort in
North and Central Europe with a stone-faced rampart and deep, parallel ditches.
Further ditches and an outer palisade enclose 17 ha.
Rmíz is the northwestern most link in a long chain of eleven similar
"central" sites dotting the Neolithic/Copper Age central Moravian
landscape. Together they suggest control of communication in the Drahane
highlands and the Hana Valley access to the Moravian Gate. The Moravian Gate
has traditionally been viewed as part of the "Amber Road," connecting
Scandinavia with Southeastern Europe. The metallurgical footprint of copper
found near Rmíz and the site distribution suggests a line of communication with
the Mondsee Culture of Austria (Type
site location) and the TRB in Poland. The tendency to build enclosed
"central sites" coupled with nearby satellite sites suggests a link
with southern Polish TRB found in a related the landscape (Bogucki 1988:141-43, Fig. 6.4),
indicating a far-flung, intercultural communication network. The region may
even have been responsible for the first appearance of copper in Scandinavia,
where no local copper was available.
It is urgent to investigate the sites, before economic development and
industrial expansion eradicates these usually well preserved places. Another threat
are pot hunters, which in 1997 and 1998 had recklessly pitted Rmíz and another
such site.
Bibliography
Bogucki, Peter
1988 Forest Farmers and Stock Breeders: Early Agriculture and its Consequences in North-Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Smíd, Miroslav
In press Rmíz near Laškov - an Early Neolithic fort: A contribution to the
knowledge of the Old and Middle Eneolithic in Central Moravia.
In press Sidliste nalevkovitych poharu u Laškova, okr. Prost Prostejov, Pravek, Nova Rada 6, cca
50 S.
1995 Výsledky zjist'ovacího výzkumu na eneolitickém hradisku Rmíz u Laškova. Pravek,
Nova Rada 3, 1993:19-77.
1994a Ein Burgwall mit
steinerner Stirnmauer aus der älteren Stufe der Trichterbecherkultur auf dem
Burgwall Rmíz bei Laškov im Kataster der Gemeinde Námt na Hané, Kreis Olomouc,
Land Mähren. Jahresschrift für mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte, 76:201-230.
1994b Nástin periodizace kultury s nálevkovitým poháry na Moravé, Pravek,
Nova Rada 2, 1992, 131-157.
1993
Kultura nalevkovitych poharu. Praveké dejiny Moravy, Brno, 165 - 179.
1992 Druhé eneolitické mohylové pohebišt na katastru obce Nám na Hané, okr. Olomouc. Pravek, Nova Rada 1,
1991:44-65, Brno.
1991 Nove nalezy kultury s moravskou malovanou keramikou na Prostejovsku. Archeologické
rozhledy XLIII, 186-206.
1990 Prispevek k poznání eneolitických mohylových pohrebišt' na strední Morave.
Praveké a slovanské osídlení Moravy 1990:67-89, Brno.
1983 Vyzkum eneolitickych mohyl na Kosiri u Slatinek (okr. Prostejov), Prehledy
vyzkumu 198:22, Brno.
1981 Stratigrafické pozorování na výinném eneolitiékem sidlisti Rmiz u Laškova,
okr. Prostéjov, Prehledy výzkum 1979:17, Brno.
Smíd,
M. and Stuchlikova, J.
In press Treti namestske
eneoliticke mohylove pohrebiste, Pravek, Nova Rada 7.
Cizmar, Z. and Smíd, M.
1996 Hroby kultury se snurovou
keramikou z Urcic, okr. Prostejov, Archeologické rozhledy XLVIII:289-299.
Svoboda, J. and Smíd, M.
1996 Dilensky objekt kultury nalevkovitych poharu na Stranske skale,
Pravek, Nova Rada 4, 1994:79-125.
[1] This paper was written and presented on behalf of Dr. M. Šmíd by Dr. M. Baldia. Originally, Dr. Šmíd was listed as the only author. However, numerous changes and additions have been made to this paper by Dr. M. Baldia.